| 118 | 0 | 72 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
低温硫酸盐侵蚀是混凝土在20℃以下环境中发生的严重劣化过程,其生成以碳硫硅钙石为代表的多种侵蚀产物直接破坏水泥基材料的结构完整性。传统防控方法在低温条件下效果有限,尤其是低铝水泥和矿物掺合料等材料调控手段在低温环境中可能产生相反效果。针对这一挑战,本工作研究了一种基于电迁移原理的预防性防控技术,旨在从源头阻止SO42–向混凝土内部渗透。通过热重分析、X射线衍射分析、衰减全反射傅里叶变换红外光谱分析和扫描电子显微镜–能量散射光谱仪分析(SEM–EDS)等微观表征方法,结合电阻率测试和孔隙结构分析,系统评估了该技术的防护效果及作用机理。研究表明,施加2.0 V电压可显著抑制硫酸盐向材料内部渗透,使试件表层SO3含量降低38.2%,同时促进孔隙结构致密化,表层累积孔体积从0.133 cm3/g降至0.118 cm3/g,阈值孔径从101.41 nm减小至85 nm。SEM–EDS分析进一步揭示,电迁移处理改变了硫酸盐在材料中的空间分布,使最大SO3含量峰值从9.89%(质量分数,下同)减少至2.80%(降幅达71.69%),有效抑制了侵蚀产物的生成。这种主动的电化学防控技术为西部高寒及沿海硫酸盐富集地区的混凝土结构防护提供了有效解决方案。
Abstract:Introduction Low-temperature sulfate attack is a major degradation mechanism in concrete. Unlike conventional sulfate attack dominated by ettringite-and gypsum-induced expansion and cracking, an exposure below 20 ℃ promotes thaumasite as a primary product. Thaumasite directly decomposes calcium silicate hydrate as a principal binding phase in cementitious materials, converting concrete into a non-cohesive mass with a loss of structural integrity. This poses critical challenges for infrastructure in western cold regions and coastal zones where high sulfate levels coincide with low ambient temperatures. Conventional prevention focuses on mix design. Strategies include densifying the matrix, reducing tricalcium aluminate, and consuming calcium hydroxide with pozzolans. However, the effectiveness is limited and can be even counterproductive at a low temperature. Sulfate-resistant cements that perform under ambient conditions can accelerate thaumasite formation in the cold. Some mineral admixtures also alter a hydration-product stability, producing variable resistance. These limitations motivate alternative protection technologies. Electrochemical approaches show a promising application potential(for instance, electrochemical chloride extraction achieves 30%–60% removal within 4–8 weeks), and the mechanistic differences between chloride and sulfate attack affect applicability. This work was to investigate a preventive electromigration control method that applied direct current electric fields in the direction opposite to sulfate diffusion, inhibiting a sulfate ion penetration during early service life and weakening subsequent degradation reactions. Unlike conventional material-based methods whose effectiveness depends on cement hydration, electromigration could operate through electric field-driven ion migration control, maintaining effectiveness in low-temperature environments where hydration reactions could be retarded. Methods Cement-based materials containing 30% limestone powder(by mass) at a water-to-binder ratio of 0.40 were employed. Portland cement P·I 42.5 grade and limestone powder were used. To simulate actual reinforced concrete structures, specimens were embedded with 5 mm diameter stainless steel rods at their centers serving as cathodes for reverse electromigration. After standard curing, specimens underwent electromigration treatment. The electromigration system comprised a direct current power source, electrode system, and electrolyte. External titanium mesh anodes and embedded stainless-steel cathodes formed an electrochemical circuit with specimens serving as electrolytes. The degradation environment utilized 5% mass concentration sodium sulfate solution. The entire experimental process was conducted in a low-temperature chamber at 5 ℃ for 175 d. To investigate electric field intensity effects on sulfate attack control, two voltage parameters were established, i.e., 1.0 V(EF1 group) and 2.0 V(EF2 group). The comprehensive characterization techniques were employed to evaluate the protection efficacy and mechanisms. Results and Discussion The macroscopic performance evaluation demonstrates a significant degradation prevention due to electromigration treatment. Sulfate-immersed specimens exhibit typical low-temperature sulfate attack characteristics including progressive microcracking at 84 d, crack propagation with surface spalling and softened products at 140 d, and severe cracking with extensive spalling at 175 d. In contrast, electromigration-treated specimens maintain a superior appearance integrity throughout exposure, with EF2 specimens displaying only minor microcracks at 175 d, while EF1 specimens show a relatively more pronounced cracking. The electrical resistivity evolution provides insights into degradation progression and protection effectiveness. Sulfate-immersed specimens exhibit a rapid resistivity increase during the first 60 d primarily due to pore filling by degradation products including gypsum and ettringite, temporarily increasing specimen densification. However, a continued exposure leads to a surface cracking, causing a resistivity growth to plateau after 140 d and declining to 18.63 Ω·m at 175 d as cracks expand and softening products accumulate. The electromigration-treated specimens, particularly EF2, demonstrate a more gradual resistivity increase and maintain relatively stable high values throughout testing, with EF2 retaining the maximum resistivity at 175 d despite minor edge cracking. The depth-dependent sulfate content distribution reveals an electromigration effectiveness in suppressing sulfate penetration. All the specimens exhibit decreasing sulfate trends from surface to interior, reflecting external-to-internal penetration processes. The 2.0 V treatment achieves a 38.2% reduction in surface layer sulfate content, compared to sulfate immersion, with deeper regions approaching water-cured baseline levels, demonstrating an effective blockage of sulfate penetration for 175 d exposure period. The thermogravimetric analysis and X-ray diffraction patterns with Rietveld quantification indicate a degradation product suppression. Sulfate-immersed surface layers(i.e., 0-5 mm) contain the maximum ettringite content of 11.95%, compared to water curing, while EF1 and EF2 specimens contain 6.25% and 4.98%, respectively. The calcium hydroxide content analysis reveals a significant consumption in sulfate-immersed surface layers(i.e., 9.27%) versus EF2 specimens(i.e., 12.9%), indicating that electromigration substantially inhibits calcium hydroxide reaction with sulfate ions. The attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectra detects a characteristic absorption peak at 625 cm-1 in sulfate-immersed surface layers, which is similar to silicon hydroxide group vibrations reported for thaumasite, indicating a minor thaumasite formation in severely degraded specimens. The result by mercury intrusion porosimetry reveals the effect of electromigration on the pore structure evolution. Sulfate-immersed surface layers exhibit 7.6% reduction in cumulative pore volume relative to water curing(i.e., from 0.144 cm3/g to 0.133 cm3/g) due to degradation product pore filling, while EF2 specimens achieve a further reduction to 0.118 cm3/g, demonstrating an enhanced surface densification. The analysis by scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive spectroscopy shows a spatial visualization of elemental distribution and microstructural changes. The quantitative line scan analysis demonstrates that electromigration treatment fundamentally alters a sulfate spatial distribution within materials, reducing maximum sulfate content from 9.89%(in mass fraction) in sulfate-immersed specimens to 3.95% in EF1 specimens(i.e., 60.06% reduction) and 2.80% in EF2 specimens(i.e., 71.69% reduction). Conclusions This work could validate an electromigration-based control method for low-temperature sulfate attack on cement-based materials. The application of 2.0 V electric field significantly suppressed a sulfate penetration, reducing a surface layer sulfate trioxide content by 38.2% relative to untreated specimens. The electromigration treatment densified a surface layer structure, decreasing a cumulative pore volume to 0.118 cm3/g, while reducing a threshold pore diameter from 101.41 nm to 85 nm. The energy-dispersive spectroscopy analysis demonstrated that electromigration fundamentally altered sulfate distribution within specimens, reducing maximum sulfate content from 9.89% to 2.80%, effectively inhibiting degradation product formation. This proactive electrochemical control technology could offer an effective solution for protecting concrete structures in sulfate-rich environments in western cold regions and coastal areas.
[1]黄奇波,覃小群,程瑞瑞,等.硫酸型酸雨参与碳酸盐岩溶蚀的研究进展[J].中国岩溶, 2019, 38(2):149–156.HUANG Qibo, QIN Xiaoqun, CHENG Ruirui, et al. Carsologica Sin,2019, 38(2):149–156.
[2]冷发光,周永祥,王晶.混凝土耐久性及其检验评价方法[M].北京:中国建材工业出版社, 2012:1–3.
[3]IKUMI T, SEGURA I. Numerical assessment of external sulfate attack in concrete structures. A review[J]. Cem Concr Res, 2019, 121:91–105.
[4]吴萌,张云升,刘志勇,等.水泥基材料碳硫硅钙石型硫酸盐侵蚀的研究进展[J].硅酸盐学报, 2022, 50(8):2270–2283.WU Meng, ZHANG Yunsheng, LIU Zhiyong, et al. J Chin Ceram Soc,2022, 50(8):2270–2283.
[5]PIPILIKAKI P, PAPAGEORGIOU D, TEAS C, et al. The effect of temperature on thaumasite formation[J]. Cem Concr Compos, 2008,30(10):964–969.
[6]SOTIRIADIS K, MRÓZ R, MÁCOVÁP, et al. Long-term sulfate resistance of synthesized cement systems with variable C3A/C4AF ratio at low temperature or ambient conditions:Insights into the crystalline and amorphous phase assemblage[J]. Cem Concr Res, 2022, 160:106902.
[7]CHENG X, TIAN W, GAO J F, et al. Performance evaluation and lifetime prediction of steel slag coarse aggregate concrete under sulfate attack[J]. Constr Build Mater, 2022, 344:128203.
[8]XU Y, CHEN Q, LV Z S, et al. Experimental and simulation evaluation of sulfate attack behavior of concrete in sulfate-rich and stray current environment[J]. Case Stud Constr Mater, 2025, 22:e04144.
[9]WANG C M, KONG F R, PAN L S. Effects of polycarboxylate superplasticizers with different side-chain lengths on the resistance of concrete to chloride penetration and sulfate attack[J]. J Build Eng,2021, 43:102817.
[10]BLANCO-VARELA M T, AGUILERA J, MARTÍNEZ-RAMÍREZ S.Effect of cement C3A content, temperature and storage medium on thaumasite formation in carbonated mortars[J]. Cem Concr Res, 2006,36(4):707–715.
[11]YAO J W, SONG H, CHEN J K. Effect of temperature on damage of mortars with different supplementary cementitious materials(SCMs)under sulfate attack[J]. Constr Build Mater, 2023, 394:132183.
[12]ELAHI M M A, SHEARER C R, NASER RASHID REZA A, et al.Improving the sulfate attack resistance of concrete by using supplementary cementitious materials(SCMs):A review[J]. Constr Build Mater, 2021, 281:122628.
[13]CARMONA-QUIROGA P M, BLANCO-VARELA M T. Resistance to thaumasite sulfate attack in Ba CO3-bearing cement pastes and mortars[J]. Cem Concr Res, 2020, 132:106052.
[14]CARMONA-QUIROGA P M, BLANCO-VARELA M T. Barium carbonate and supplementary cementitious materials to counteract thaumasite sulfate attack in mortars:Effect of aggregate composition[J].Constr Build Mater, 2021, 282:122583.
[15]郑靓,韦江雄,余其俊,等.电化学除盐过程中钢筋表面发生的电极反应[J].硅酸盐学报, 2009, 37(7):1190–1195.ZHENG Liang, WEI Jiangxiong, YU Qijun, et al. J Chin Ceram Soc,2009, 37(7):1190–1195.
[16]金伟良,黄楠,许晨,等.双向电渗对钢筋混凝土修复效果的试验研究:保护层阻锈剂、氯离子和总碱度的变化规律[J].浙江大学学报(工学版), 2014, 48(9):1586–1594.JIN Weiliang, HUANG Nan, XU Chen, et al. J Zhejiang Univ Eng Sci,2014, 48(9):1586–1594.
[17]姚武,王灵芝,陈逸群.超声电化学机制对砂浆中氯离子萃取效率的影响[J].硅酸盐学报, 2014, 42(8):1032–1036.YAO Wu, WANG Lingzhi, CHEN Yiqun. J Chin Ceram Soc, 2014,42(8):1032–1036.
[18]MENG Z Z, LIU Q F, XIA J, et al. Mechanical–transport–chemical modeling of electrochemical repair methods for corrosion-induced cracking in marine concrete[J]. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng,2022, 37(14):1854–1874.
[19]LUCA BERTOLINI PHD, DR SC TECH BERNHARD ELSENER PHD, PEDEFERRI P, et al. Corrosion of Steel in Concrete:Prevention,Diagnosis, Repair[M]. New York:John Wiley&Sons, 2003.
[20]LUCERO C L, SPRAGG R P, BENTZ D P, et al. Neutron radiography measurement of salt solution absorption in mortar[J]. ACI Mater J,2017, 114(1):149–159.
[21]CARDENAS H, KUPWADE-PATIL K, EKLUND S. Recovery from sulfate attack in concrete via electrokinetic nanoparticle treatment[J]. J Mater Civ Eng, 2011, 23(7):1103–1112.
[22]中国建筑材料科学研究总院. GB 175—2007通用硅酸盐水泥[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2008.
[23]邓德华,肖佳,元强,等.石灰石粉对水泥基材料抗硫酸盐侵蚀性的影响及其机理[J].硅酸盐学报, 2006, 34(10):1243–1248.DENG Dehua, XIAO Jia, YUAN Qiang, et al. J Chin Ceram Soc, 2006,34(10):1243–1248.
[24]中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. GB/T 50082—2009普通混凝土长期性能和耐久性能试验方法标准[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.
[25]American Society for Testing and Materials(ASTM). Standard test method for length change of hydraulic-cement mortars exposed to a sulfate solution[S]. ASTM C1012-2009. West Conshohocken, 2009.
[26]DEY G, GANGULI A, BHATTACHARJEE B, et al. Electrical response-based technique for estimation of degree of moisture saturation in cement concrete and mortar in drying and wetting cycle[J].Constr Build Mater, 2020, 262:120855.
[27]VIET L, KYOUNG K, JOO K, et al. Electrical properties of smart ultra-high performance concrete under various temperatures,humidities, and age of concrete[J]. Cem Concr Compos, 2021, 118:103979.
[28]于琦,万小梅,赵铁军,等.碱激发矿渣混凝土抗氯离子渗透性及电测试验方法研究[J].材料导报, 2022, 36(5):100–105.YU Qi, WAN Xiaomei, ZHAO Tiejun, et al. Mater Rep, 2022, 36(5):100–105.
[29]SCRIVENER K, SNELLINGS R, LOTHENBACH B. A practical guide to microstructural analysis of cementitious materials[M]. Boca Raton:CRC Press, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1201/b19074
[30]WASHBURN E W. Note on a method of determining the distribution of pore sizes in a porous material[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1921,7(4):115–116.
[31]MA H Y. Mercury intrusion porosimetry in concrete technology:Tips in measurement, pore structure parameter acquisition and application[J]. J Porous Mater, 2014, 21(2):207–215.
[32]SOJA W, GEORGET F, MARAGHECHI H, et al. Evolution of microstructural changes in cement paste during environmental drying[J]. Cem Concr Res, 2020, 134:106093.
[33]ZHANG Z Y, ZHOU J T, YANG J, et al. Understanding of the deterioration characteristic of concrete exposed to external sulfate attack:Insight into mesoscopic pore structures[J]. Constr Build Mater,2020, 260:119932.
[34]SOTIRIADIS K, MÁCOVÁP, MAZUR A S, et al. Long-term thaumasite sulfate attack on Portland-limestone cement concrete:A multi-technique analytical approach for assessing phase assemblage[J].Cem Concr Res, 2020, 130:105995.
[35]MARCOTTE T D, HANSSON C M, HOPE B B. The effect of the electrochemical chloride extraction treatment on steel-reinforced mortar Part II Microstructural characterization[J]. Cem Concr Res,1999, 29(10):1561–1568.
[36]CHEN W L, XU S H, ZHANG W L, et al. Effect of bidirectional electromigration rehabilitation on corroded reinforcement and surrounding concrete in chloride contaminated concrete[J]. J Build Eng,2024, 93:109840.
[37]WANG Q, WILSON W, SCRIVENER K. Unidirectional penetration approach for characterizing sulfate attack mechanisms on cement mortars and pastes[J]. Cem Concr Res, 2023, 169:107166.
基本信息:
DOI:10.14062/j.issn.0454-5648.20250228
中图分类号:TU528
引用信息:
[1]方正,任员良,周帅,等.电迁移防控水泥基材料低温硫酸盐侵蚀的行为及机理[J].硅酸盐学报,2026,54(02):512-526.DOI:10.14062/j.issn.0454-5648.20250228.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(52178187;52478235)
2025-03-29
2025
2025-10-28
2025
1
2026-01-23
2026-01-23
2026-01-23